Slide #50 - "Expert Corroboration" Orientation

This slide is an outline slide.

How Many Experts?

Two.

Richard Gage will cite two authorities here. Neither are members of AE911Truth. We know exactly how much one of his experts examined the evidence of Building 7's collapse (he watched a video), and the second is highly suspect (likely the same).

Meanwhile, hundreds of other scientists and experts has weighed in on these collapses, and they all assert nothing more than the planes' impacts as to the human contribution to these collapses.

Brent Blanchard and Implosion World

For example, Brent Blanchard is the senior editor of Implosionworld.com and Director of Field Operations at Protec Documentation Services. Protec lives and breathes controlled demolitions with explosives, documenting many such events for dozens of companies.

In fact, Protec had several seismographs working to monitor demolition sites in Manhattan. When these readouts are combined with those of the monitors at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Brent Blanchard and Protec can state confidently that no spikes associated with an explosive device happened in conjunction with the collapse of these buildings.

All of this is available in a paper Blanchard prepared on the subject. But I'll say it again. This is scientifically measurable evidence that no explosives were used to bring down those buildings.

Gage's Seventh Point Denied

Since neither of Gage's experts offer anything other than their opinion about the collapse of WTC 7, certainly nothing that contradicts the clear scientific evidence to the contrary, Gage's seventh point is denied.

< Previous Slide | Index | Next Slide >